# Turn app reviews into a dated product evidence brief. Check complaints against what changed Collect a page of App Store reviews, find the release or support information relevant to each theme and distinguish recent issues from older reports. Litescrape, Exa and Firecrawl keep those sources together. - For: Product managers and app marketers - Providers: 3 (Litescrape, Exa and Firecrawl), 3 tools - Example (One review page, one search for official release context and one supporting page read): at most $0.03, computed from the live catalog - Updated: 2026-11-03 ## Each provider does one part No single provider covers this job. Through Agentik your AI calls each one for its part, from one connection and one prepaid balance. - **Litescrape** (1 tool, at most $0.00015): The selected storefront's public app reviews and their dates. - **Exa** (1 tool, at most $0.03): Official release notes and relevant support pages found by search. - **Firecrawl** (1 tool, at most $0.0025): The source text needed to check a release or support claim. ## Give this to your agent ```text Use my connected Agentik MCP server for this job: app review evidence brief. Prepare a product evidence brief for my app from one recent review page. Keep the storefront, dates and app version where available. Search for the relevant official release notes and read one supporting page. Group the observations into actionable questions without treating the sample as a satisfaction score or assuming that a reported issue still exists. Use these Agentik tools for the written steps: litescrape/apple-app-store-reviews, exa/search, firecrawl/scrape. Inspect their current schemas and availability first. Ask for missing inputs and use identifiers returned by actual earlier results. The page's example identifiers illustrate input shapes. Quote more pages before expanding. Preserve source links, dates and uncertainty. Before running anything, inspect each tool with inspect_tool, ask me for any input you don’t have instead of inventing it, and tell me the total price. Wait for my go. At the end, tell me what Agentik charged. ``` ## You provide - App Store product ID - Storefront and review period - The product question to investigate ## Before this job - The tools must be available in your connected Agentik catalog. Ask for the missing provider configuration if a tool is unavailable. ## What you get: a dated product brief with source reviews and release context - A dated review sample - Themes with supporting reviews - Release and support context - Questions for the product team and explicit unknowns ## How to prepare an app review evidence brief in Claude or ChatGPT Prices are the most each call can reserve for this example: One review page, one search for official release context and one supporting page read. ### 1. Collect a dated review sample Use the actual product ID and keep the storefront and collection date beside the reviews. - [Apple App Store reviews](/tools/litescrape/apple-app-store-reviews.md) `litescrape/apple-app-store-reviews` (Litescrape): at most $0.00015 ### 2. Find release and support context Prefer the developer's official sources and preserve their dates. - [Exa web search](/tools/exa/search.md) `exa/search` (Exa): at most $0.03 ### 3. Read the supporting page Check the page before connecting a review theme to a product change. - [Scrape a web page to markdown](/tools/firecrawl/scrape.md) `firecrawl/scrape` (Firecrawl): at most $0.0025 Example total: at most $0.03. Each call is billed for measured usage; unused reservations are released. ## Ask it your way - Prepare a product evidence brief for my app from one recent review page. - Keep the sample small and cite the source for each conclusion. ## Why through Agentik - Collect the sources through one Agentik connection. - Inspect the price of each bounded call before running it. - Keep the source evidence beside the proposed action. ## Good to know - Review order and availability depend on the storefront. - A reported failure does not establish its cause or whether a later release resolved it. ## When to use something else For full-store review ingestion, version tracking and ongoing support routing, use a dedicated app feedback system. This playbook examines one bounded sample. ## App review evidence brief: questions ### What does the example cost? At most $0.03 for the illustrated calls. Inspect the current tools and quote any additional pages or results before expanding. ### Does the result cover every source? No. Public feeds and search results can be incomplete. Keep the collection date, sample size and missing evidence visible. ### Does this send messages or change an account? No. These steps collect public evidence and prepare a brief. Sending a message or changing an account requires a separate instruction. ## Keep going - [App feedback digest](/app-feedback-digest.md): Your latest App Store and Google Play reviews with what people say on Reddit and X, sorted into bugs, feature requests and praise with counts and quotes. - [Competitor app teardown](/competitor-app-teardown.md): A competitor’s app on both stores, the Google Play keywords it ranks for, the ads it runs to get installs, and how it shows up on TikTok. - [App Store keyword plan](/aso-keyword-plan.md): Your app’s listing, the App Store keywords it and its closest competitor rank for, the competing apps, and the “best app” articles people read, turned into a new title, subtitle and keyword field. - [Research tools for your agent](/tools/research.md) - [Scraping tools for your agent](/tools/scraping.md) [All playbooks](/playbooks.md) · [Connection guides](/docs/clients.md) · [Billing](/docs/billing.md) --- [HTML page](/app-review-evidence-brief) · [Agent index](/llms.txt)