Find service opportunities in local business reviews

Local business reviews, their websites and independent context, combined into a sourced list of service opportunities.

Steps

At most, per call

Find recurring customer problems in a small sample of local reviews, then check what the businesses promise on their websites. Litescrape supplies public listings and reviews, Firecrawl reads the sites and Exa finds independent context.

Before this job

The tools must be available in your connected Agentik catalog. Ask for the missing provider configuration if a tool is unavailable.

Step 1: Identify businesses and read one review page
Resolve the exact business before reusing its listing ID. Preserve dates and stop after the approved page.
- Google MapsLitescrape$0.00015
- Google Maps reviewsLitescrape$0.00015
Step 2: Check the business website
Read the source page behind a proposed gap in service or information.
- Scrape a web page to markdownFirecrawl$0.0025
Step 3: Check independent context
Search the chosen service and location to qualify the recommendation before writing the brief.
- Exa web searchExa$0.03

Cost of the example

At most $0.03one run

One listing search, one review page, one business website and one independent search. Further businesses are quoted separately.

Give this to your agent

Use my connected Agentik MCP server for this job: local review opportunities.

Research service opportunities among local businesses of my chosen type and city. Find a small listing sample, confirm the businesses' identities and read one review page. Read the chosen business's own website and find independent context for its services. Separate customer statements from verified website facts. Give an opportunity only when its evidence supports it, and prepare no outreach without my instruction.

Use these Agentik tools for the written steps: litescrape/google-maps, litescrape/google-reviews, firecrawl/scrape, exa/search. Inspect their current schemas and availability first. Ask for missing inputs and use identifiers returned by actual earlier results. The page's example identifiers illustrate input shapes. Quote more pages before expanding. Preserve source links, dates and uncertainty.

Before running anything, inspect each tool with inspect_tool, ask me for any input you don’t have instead of inventing it, and tell me the total price. Wait for my go. At the end, tell me what Agentik charged.

3 providers, one connection

What you get

A sourced shortlist of local service opportunities.

You provide

Business type and city
A service you can deliver
Maximum businesses and review pages

Your agent returns

Business identities and source links
Recurring complaints in the collected sample
Website claims checked against the observations
An opportunity and its supporting evidence for each business

Your evidence briefExample layout

Scope and source dates
Observations with source links
Interpretation and uncertainty
Proposed next steps

Placeholders. Your rows come from your run.

Each provider does one part

No single provider covers this job. Your agent calls each one for its part, from one connection.

Good to know

A review is a customer's statement, not independently verified proof of a defect.
A small sample cannot estimate complaint prevalence across all customers.

When to use something else

For continuous review collection and response management across every location, use a dedicated reputation management system. This job prepares a bounded research brief.