Review a brand’s latest social posts

A dated briefing of a brand’s latest collected social posts, with source links, observation dates and an honest account of what is fresh.

Steps

At most, per call

Ask for a dated review of a brand's recent collected posts. Following the brand can affect the provider's refresh priority, while each briefing reports only the observations available when you run it.

Before this job

The brand's account is already collected, or the account-collection playbook is completed first.
Brand reports require the actual brand key and its account association; an account ID alone is not a brand key.

Step 1: Check the brand and available data
Read the current coverage, resolve the brand and keep accounts known only through organic posts. Use the returned brand key and the platforms actually collected.
- Adspy.sh ad and organic coverageAdspy.shFree
- Find brands in Adspy.shAdspy.sh$0.001
Step 2: Follow the chosen brand
Following is private to the workspace and can affect refresh priority for accounts already collected. It does not create an Agentik schedule or discover new accounts.
- Follow a brand on Adspy.shAdspy.shFree
Step 3: Read the dated sample
Use the requested since date and platform. No new results may mean no observed new posts; keep collection freshness visible.
- Adspy.sh organic brand postsAdspy.sh$0.04

Cost of the example

At most $0.05one run

One brand lookup, one follow and up to 20 TikTok posts since the supplied example date. This is a manually requested briefing, not a scheduled task.

Add comparable cadence context

At most $0.17alternative scenario

The example plus a social report. Describe cadence change only when the returned report supports a comparable baseline.

Give this to your agent

Use my connected Agentik MCP server for this job: weekly brand social review.

Review my brand's collected posts since the date I provide. Confirm my intent to follow the brand, then follow it and read up to 20 recent posts on the selected platform. Report what is new in that sample, observed dates and whether collection is fresh. Do not claim a cadence change from one recent list. If I request a change against a comparable baseline, quote and read the additional social report. This prompt is run when I ask; it does not schedule messages, deliver alerts or guarantee continuous monitoring.

Use these Agentik tools for the written steps: adspy/get-context, adspy/search-brands, adspy/follow-brand, adspy/list-social-posts, adspy/get-brand-social. Reuse identifiers from actual earlier results, never the illustrative page inputs. When collection is needed, quote it separately and wait for my approval. Use the account-collection playbook. Do not invent a handle, move an account attached to another brand, or treat a waiting job as failed.

Keep platform, period, observation dates, coverage, sample size, denominator, uncertainty and source links. Preserve the provider's no_clear_gap and insufficient-data conclusions. Do not infer spend, reach, conversions, ROAS or causal performance from public posts.

Before running anything, inspect each tool with inspect_tool, ask me for any input you don’t have instead of inventing it, and tell me the total price. Wait for my go. At the end, tell me what Agentik charged.

1 provider, one connection

Adspy.sh$0.05

What you get

A dated briefing of newly observed brand posts.

You provide

Brand or a bounded watchlist
Platforms
Since date and the question to track

Your agent returns

Newly observed posts with dates and sources
Themes and examples in the available sample
Freshness and incomplete-coverage notes
A repeatable prompt for the next manual review

Your sourced briefExample layout

Coverage and observation dates
Evidence and source posts
Findings with uncertainty
Proposed next steps

Placeholders. Your rows come from your run.

One provider, the complete research job

Adspy supplies the observations and research tools for this job through your existing Agentik connection and balance.

Adspy.shObserved public posts, reports and the source evidence for this research task.4 tools

Good to know

These are observed public posts. Missing counts stay unknown; rounded counts and incomplete history stay labelled.
TikTok and YouTube engagement is per view; Instagram engagement is per follower. Keep those bases separate.
Suspected paid-reach posts are shown separately and excluded from the organic figures as the provider reports them.
Post tags may come from video, a cover and caption, or a linked ad. Keep that provenance and do not invent a missing transcript.
Weekly is a suggested review rhythm. Copying this prompt or following a brand does not create an Agentik scheduler, notification or automatic report.
A change in posting rhythm requires comparable baseline evidence; otherwise describe only the dated sample.

When to use something else

For private reach, conversions or paid account performance, use your connected account's reporting tools. Public posts provide a different and incomplete set of observations.

Questions

What does the example cost?

At most $0.05 for the example described. New account collection and any larger volume are quoted separately. You pay the settled usage; repeated or included items can cost less.

Are AI tags billed separately?

No. Available post tags are included with the post. A missing analysis stays missing, and a cover-based analysis is identified as such.

Can the result prove business performance?

No. Public engagement, posting activity and creative reuse are observed signals. They do not establish spend, conversions, profitability or causal lift.